SCOTUS Dashboard
The Docket
Upcoming
2025 Term · 25-197
Apr 20, 2026
Argued
2025 Term · 25-83
Circuit SplitArgued Mar 30, 2026
Listen on Spotify ↗Decided
2025 Term · 24-813
Decided Apr 17, 2026 · Unanimous
Listen on Spotify ↗2025 Term · 24-171
Decided Mar 25, 2026 · Unanimous
Listen on Spotify ↗Current Circuit Splits
These active circuit splits are currently before the Supreme Court. Cert has been granted and a decision is pending.
Whether a multiemployer pension plan actuary may select actuarial assumptions for calculating withdrawal liability after the statutory measurement date (the end of the prior plan year), or whether all such assumptions must be fixed by that date.
Circuit courts disagree on whether ERISA requires actuarial assumptions used to calculate employer withdrawal liability to be locked in by the end of the prior plan year or whether actuaries may select assumptions after that date. This affects billions of dollars in potential obligations for thousands of employers participating in multiemployer pension plans.
Assumptions must be fixed by measurement date
Holds that all actuarial assumptions for calculating withdrawal liability must be selected no later than the statutory measurement date (end of the prior plan year), providing employers with greater predictability.
Assumptions may be selected after measurement date
Holds that plan actuaries may select actuarial assumptions after the statutory measurement date, allowing the use of more current data in withdrawal liability calculations.
What legal standards govern claims of discrimination in the operation of places of public accommodation under Title II of the Civil Rights Act?
Circuit courts have applied differing standards for establishing discrimination claims under Title II, particularly regarding the types of evidence sufficient to prove discriminatory treatment and the availability of compensatory damages. The Supreme Court granted cert to resolve the disagreement.
Broader liability standard
Holds that a broader range of evidence, including circumstantial evidence of differential treatment, may suffice to establish a Title II claim, with compensatory damages available.
Source: CourtListener · Analysis: Claude AI · See all circuit splits →
Analysis
& Opinions
NYT Politics · Jodi Kantor and Adam Liptak
Takeaways From the Supreme Court’s Shadow Papers ↗2026-04-18
NYT Politics · Jodi Kantor and Adam Liptak
Inside the Supreme Court’s Risky New Way of Doing Business ↗2026-04-18
NYT Politics · Adam Liptak and Jodi Kantor
Key Excerpts From the Supreme Court’s Secret Memos ↗2026-04-18
SCOTUSblog · Amy Howe
Court unanimously sides with oil and gas companies in suit over damage to Louisiana coast ↗2026-04-17
SCOTUSblog · Kelsey Dallas
Court to consider rights of lawful permanent residents accused of committing a crime ↗2026-04-17
Cases by Circuit
Upcoming and pending-decision cases mapped by the federal appeals court circuit they originated in. Hover over a state or badge to see cases. Bold lines show circuit boundaries; thinner lines show state borders.
Badge colors
Click a state or badge to see cases. Bold lines show circuit boundaries.
Pending cases by circuit
1st Circuit
1 case (1 argued)
2nd Circuit
5 cases (1 upcoming, 4 argued)
3rd Circuit
1 case (1 argued)
4th Circuit
4 cases (2 upcoming, 2 argued)
5th Circuit
10 cases (1 upcoming, 9 argued)
6th Circuit
2 cases (2 argued)
7th Circuit
1 case (1 argued)
8th Circuit
—
9th Circuit
4 cases (2 upcoming, 2 argued)
10th Circuit
1 case (1 argued)
11th Circuit
2 cases (2 argued)
D.C. Circuit
1 case (1 argued)
Court Calendar
Oral argument sessions and conference dates for the October Term 2025. Argument dates link to case pages. Conference dates are when the Justices meet privately to discuss pending petitions and argued cases.
April 2026
- Apr 1 · 25-365
Trump v. Barbara
- Apr 2
Conference
- Apr 17
Conference
- Apr 20 · 25-197
T.M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation
- Apr 20 · 25-466
Sripetch v. Securities and Exchange Commission
- Apr 21 · 25-406
Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T, Inc.
- Apr 22 · 25-429
Bondi v. Lau
- Apr 24
Conference
- Apr 27 · 24-1068
Monsanto Company v. John L. Durnell
- Apr 27 · 25-112
Okello T. Chatrie v. United States
- Apr 28 · 24-856
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe I
- Apr 29 · 24-889
Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.
Justices
Speaking turns and estimated speaking time per justice across all 2025 term oral arguments, ranked by time on record.

Justice Jackson
Speaking time
Speaking turns

Justice Sotomayor
Speaking time
Speaking turns

Justice Kagan
Speaking time
Speaking turns

Justice Kavanaugh
Speaking time
Speaking turns

Justice Gorsuch
Speaking time
Speaking turns

Chief Justice Roberts
Speaking time
Speaking turns

Justice Barrett
Speaking time
Speaking turns

Justice Alito
Speaking time
Speaking turns

Justice Thomas
Speaking time
Speaking turns
Counsel
Attorneys with 2 or more cases in the 2025 term, ranked by speaking time. Click a name to see the cases they argued.
Speaking time
Cases argued
Speaking time
Cases argued
Speaking time
Cases argued
Speaking time
Cases argued
Speaking time
Cases argued
Speaking time
Cases argued
Speaking time
Cases argued
Speaking time
Cases argued
About
This site tracks upcoming and recent oral arguments before the United States Supreme Court. Case information is compiled directly from official Supreme Court records, including transcripts, docket filings, and published opinions. Summaries, legal term explanations, and party position analyses are generated using AI and are intended to orient readers and direct further human research and analysis. They should not be treated as legal advice or authoritative legal commentary. Click any case to read a plain-English breakdown of the facts, the legal question, and each side’s argument. The site is updated automatically each day at 5pm ET. Built by William Higgins. For comments or suggestions, contact william.higgins@sciencespo.fr.