SCOTUS Dashboard
The Docket
Upcoming
No cases
Argued
2025 Term · 24-1068
Circuit SplitArgued Apr 27, 2026
Listen on Spotify ↗Decided
2025 Term · 24-889
Decided Jun 4, 2026 · Unanimous
Listen on Spotify ↗2025 Term · 25-406
Decided Jun 4, 2026 · 8–1
Listen on Spotify ↗Current Circuit Splits
These active circuit splits are currently before the Supreme Court. Cert has been granted and a decision is pending.
Whether the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) authorizes individual-capacity damages suits against state prison officials, and whether Congress has constitutional power under the Spending Clause to impose such personal liability.
Circuits are split on whether RLUIPA permits suits for money damages against prison officials in their individual capacities. Some circuits allow such suits while others hold that RLUIPA does not clearly authorize individual-capacity damages, raising questions about the scope of Congressional spending power to impose personal liability on non-recipients of federal funds.
RLUIPA allows individual-capacity damages
Holds that RLUIPA authorizes suits for money damages against state prison officials in their individual capacities, as the statute's text is broad enough to encompass such claims.
RLUIPA does not authorize individual-capacity damages
Holds that RLUIPA does not clearly authorize individual-capacity damages suits against state prison officials, and Spending Clause legislation cannot impose personal liability on individuals who are not direct recipients of federal funds.
Whether a district court may consider factors related to potential errors or unfairness in a defendant's conviction or sentence as part of the 'extraordinary and compelling reasons' analysis for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A).
Circuits disagree on whether compassionate release motions may be used to raise claims that overlap with habeas corpus challenges, such as alleged sentencing errors or constitutional violations in the underlying conviction. Some circuits permit consideration of such factors, while others hold that § 3582(c)(1)(A) cannot be used as a substitute for § 2255 habeas relief.
May consider conviction/sentence errors
Holds that district courts may consider legal errors or unfairness in a defendant's conviction or sentence as one factor in the extraordinary and compelling reasons analysis for compassionate release.
Cannot use compassionate release for habeas-type claims
Holds that § 3582(c)(1)(A) is not an alternative avenue for claims properly raised under § 2255, and errors in conviction or sentencing cannot constitute extraordinary and compelling reasons for compassionate release.
Source: CourtListener · Analysis: Claude AI · See all circuit splits →
Analysis
& Opinions
SCOTUSblog · Kelsey Dallas
When must justices recuse themselves over family members’ acts? ↗2026-06-10
SCOTUSblog · Kelsey Dallas, Nora Collins
Trump to ask justices to review his suit against CNN ↗2026-06-09
Cases by Circuit
Upcoming and pending-decision cases mapped by the federal appeals court circuit they originated in. Hover over a state or badge to see cases. Bold lines show circuit boundaries; thinner lines show state borders.
Badge colors
Click a state or badge to see cases. Bold lines show circuit boundaries.
Pending cases by circuit
1st Circuit
1 case (1 argued)
2nd Circuit
2 cases (2 argued)
3rd Circuit
—
4th Circuit
3 cases (3 argued)
5th Circuit
7 cases (7 argued)
6th Circuit
2 cases (2 argued)
7th Circuit
—
8th Circuit
—
9th Circuit
3 cases (3 argued)
10th Circuit
—
11th Circuit
—
D.C. Circuit
1 case (1 argued)
Court Calendar
Oral argument sessions and conference dates for the October Term 2025. Argument dates link to case pages. Conference dates are when the Justices meet privately to discuss pending petitions and argued cases.
June 2026
- Jun 4
Conference
- Jun 11
Conference
- Jun 18
Conference
- Jun 25
Conference
Justices
Speaking turns and estimated speaking time per justice across all 2025 term oral arguments, ranked by time on record.

Justice Jackson
Speaking time
Speaking turns

Justice Sotomayor
Speaking time
Speaking turns

Justice Kagan
Speaking time
Speaking turns

Justice Kavanaugh
Speaking time
Speaking turns

Justice Gorsuch
Speaking time
Speaking turns

Chief Justice Roberts
Speaking time
Speaking turns

Justice Barrett
Speaking time
Speaking turns

Justice Alito
Speaking time
Speaking turns

Justice Thomas
Speaking time
Speaking turns
Counsel
Attorneys with 2 or more cases in the 2025 term, ranked by speaking time. Click a name to see the cases they argued.
Speaking time
Cases argued
Speaking time
Cases argued
Speaking time
Cases argued
Speaking time
Cases argued
Speaking time
Cases argued
Speaking time
Cases argued
Speaking time
Cases argued
Speaking time
Cases argued
About
This site tracks upcoming and recent oral arguments before the United States Supreme Court. Case information is compiled directly from official Supreme Court records, including transcripts, docket filings, and published opinions. Summaries, legal term explanations, and party position analyses are generated using AI and are intended to orient readers and direct further human research and analysis. They should not be treated as legal advice or authoritative legal commentary. Click any case to read a plain-English breakdown of the facts, the legal question, and each side’s argument. The site is updated automatically each day at 5pm ET. Built by William Higgins. For comments or suggestions, contact william.higgins@sciencespo.fr.