United States v. Skrmetti
What the Court Decided
The Court upheld a Tennessee law restricting certain gender-affirming medical treatments for minors, finding it did not violate the Equal Protection Clause.
npm run enrich-precedents to add it.Cited In
Little v. Hecox
2025 Term · 24-38
Cited by petitioners for the proposition that merely referencing transgender identity in a statute does not make it a transgender-status classification, and that the application of the law must turn on transgender status to trigger heightened scrutiny.
West Virginia v. B.P.J.
2025 Term · 24-43
Cited by both West Virginia and the U.S. for the proposition that a law classifying on biological sex and medical treatment is not a transgender classification, and that legislatures have deference in areas of evolving science.
Chiles v. Salazar
2025 Term · 24-539
Justice Jackson compared this case to Skrmetti, where the Court upheld state regulation of gender-affirming medical treatments for minors, questioning why talk-therapy regulation should be treated differently. Mooppan distinguished it because speech triggers the First Amendment.