Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus

·2014

What the Court Decided

The Court held that a plaintiff challenging a law need not wait to be prosecuted but must show a sufficiently imminent and credible threat of enforcement to establish standing.

Full entry not yet generated. Run npm run enrich-precedents to add it.

Cited In

First Choice Women's Resource Centers v. Platkin

2025 Term · 24-781

Established the framework for pre-enforcement standing, holding that a credible threat of enforcement satisfies Article III's imminence requirement and identified injuries like litigation burdens and imminent adverse orders.

Chiles v. Salazar

2025 Term · 24-539

Petitioner cited this case for the standing principle that a credible threat of enforcement exists when a law on its face covers the plaintiff's intended conduct and anyone can file a complaint triggering enforcement.