Utah v. Evans

·2002

What the Court Decided

The Court declined to read into a statute an unexpressed intent to bar jurisdiction that had previously been exercised.

Full entry not yet generated. Run npm run enrich-precedents to add it.

Cited In

Bowe v. United States

2025 Term · 24-5438

Cited by both sides in the dispute over the clear statement rule: the government argued it supports a narrower reading of Castro's language, while petitioner relied on it for the principle against reading an unexpressed intent to bar previously exercised jurisdiction.