TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez

594 U.S. 413·2021

What the Court Decided

The Court held that plaintiffs must demonstrate their alleged injury has a close relationship to harms traditionally recognized as providing a basis for lawsuits.

Full entry not yet generated. Run npm run enrich-precedents to add it.

Cited In

Noem v. Al Otro Lado

2025 Term · 25-5

Central to the government's standing argument, as this case set a high bar requiring plaintiffs to show concrete, particularized harm to satisfy Article III standing, not merely a statutory violation.

Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections

2025 Term · 24-568

Cited in discussing whether standing requires a showing of history and tradition supporting the type of injury alleged, and whether pocketbook injuries provide an easier path under this framework.