Terry v. Ohio

392 U.S. 1·1968

What the Court Decided

Established the reasonable suspicion standard permitting brief investigatory stops based on specific and articulable facts suggesting criminal activity.

Full entry not yet generated. Run npm run enrich-precedents to add it.

Cited In

Case v. Montana

2025 Term · 24-624

The Montana Supreme Court's formulation — 'objective, specific, and articulable facts from which an experienced officer would suspect' — was criticized as tracking Terry's reasonable suspicion language rather than the Brigham City standard.