Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

·2002

What the Court Decided

The Supreme Court held that property interests are defined by both their spatial and temporal dimensions, and that a temporary restriction on use does not constitute a per se taking.

Full entry not yet generated. Run npm run enrich-precedents to add it.

Cited In

Havana Docks Corp. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.

2025 Term · 24-983

Cited by respondent for the proposition that both spatial and temporal limits define the metes and bounds of property interests, supporting the argument that time-limited interests cannot generate perpetual trafficking claims.