Smiley v. Holm

285 U.S. 355·1932

What the Court Decided

The Court interpreted the Elections Clause to give states broad authority to regulate the time, place, and manner of congressional elections, subject to congressional override.

Full entry not yet generated. Run npm run enrich-precedents to add it.

Cited In

Watson v. Republican National Committee

2025 Term · 24-1260

This case is cited for the scope of state authority under the Elections Clause of the Constitution, relevant to the petitioner's argument that states have broad power to administer federal elections.