Shurtleff v. United States

·1903

What the Court Decided

Held that a removal without notice and hearing was not for the statutory specified causes (INM), establishing that specified removal grounds carry implied procedural protections.

Full entry not yet generated. Run npm run enrich-precedents to add it.

Cited In

Trump v. Cook

2025 Term · 25A312

Both sides relied on it for the proposition that when a statute specifies grounds for removal (like INM), notice and a hearing are required even if the statute doesn't expressly say so. The government argued this principle applies only to INM, not to the broader term 'cause.'