National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra (NIFLA)

585 U.S. 755·2018

What the Court Decided

The Court struck down a California law requiring crisis pregnancy centers to provide certain notices, holding there is no separate category of 'professional speech' exempt from ordinary First Amendment scrutiny.

Full entry not yet generated. Run npm run enrich-precedents to add it.

Cited In

Chiles v. Salazar

2025 Term · 24-539

Central to the dispute — petitioner argued NIFLA rejected a 'professional speech' exception to the First Amendment and warned against state manipulation of professional-client conversations. Respondent tried to distinguish it as broader than the narrow healthcare treatment context at issue here.