Esteras v. United States

·2024

What the Court Decided

A recent Supreme Court decision discussing the factors relevant to deciding whether to revoke supervised release and what sentence to impose upon revocation.

Full entry not yet generated. Run npm run enrich-precedents to add it.

Cited In

Rico v. United States

2025 Term · 24-1056

Cited by the government to argue that courts at revocation hearings should consider all forward-looking interests that criminal sentences serve, including deterrence and incapacitation, supporting the relevance of post-abscondment conduct.