Johnson v. Jones

515 U.S. 304·1995

What the Court Decided

Held that a district court's determination that sufficient evidence exists to send a qualified immunity case to the jury is not an immediately appealable collateral order, distinguishing pure legal questions from factual sufficiency questions.

Full entry not yet generated. Run npm run enrich-precedents to add it.

Cited In

GEO Group v. Menocal

2025 Term · 24-758

Respondents cited it to show that when an immunity determination turns on whether there is a sufficient factual dispute to send to a jury — as Yearsley does — the order is not immediately appealable.